View-blocking fence objectionable

We have covered Wellington’s high profile fence stoush, dubbed ‘Fencegate’ by the media, in several blogs. In a nutshell, Peter and Sylvia Aitchison’s harbour views were destroyed when their neighbour, David Walmsley, built a fence blocking their view. The Aitchisons sought the assistance of the Environment Court, to demonstrate that the fence should never have been erected and should go.

An initial Environment Court decision determined that in  allowing the structure the Wellington City Council had incorrectly interpreted the District Plan. The Environment Court today released a further decision that the structure was objectionable, and exercised its power to order its removal. Judge Brian Dwyer said that the Aitchisons established their case by an ‘overwhelming margin’.

The Aitchisons have one month to file an enforcement order requiring removal of the fence, but as a further appeal relating to the original decision around the interpretation of the District Plan will be heard in the High Court next month, further decisions surrounding the fence may be on hold until that date.

The saga is a strong reminder to have regard for your neighbours. It stands to reason that your ability to do what you like on your property will be limited, if your actions could severely affect those around you.

One thought on “View-blocking fence objectionable

  1. Pingback: Aitchisons awarded costs in Fencegate | SITE VISIT

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s