Fence or Fort?


‘The Bible tells us to love our neighbours, and also to love our enemies; probably because generally they are the same people.’ ― G.K. Chesterton

Yesterday news was posted about the Aitchison’s Wellington waterfront-view woes. The Aitchison’s neighbour had constructed a 4 metre high fort on the border of his premises, obscuring the Aitchison’s view and cutting approximately $900,000 off the value of their property.

The structure was initially approved by the Wellington City Council, as it was listed as a fort rather than the view obstructing fence it ostensibly was. The exploitation of this technicality is all the more perplexing given that, in the words of Wellington’s deputy-mayor Justin Lester, the neighbours had ‘no apparent need for a fort.’

Fence-gate had a happy ending, as indignation gave way to relief for both the Aitchison’s, and the non-fence sitting public, when the unobstructed view of the Environment Court was that the Council erred in allowing the structure to be built.  The Council have indicated they will implement the decision of the Court and order the fence be demolished.obstructedviewwithcredit

3 thoughts on “Fence or Fort?

  1. Pingback: Attempt to Re-litigate Fencegate | SITE VISIT

  2. Pingback: Return of Fencegate | SITE VISIT

  3. Pingback: Aitchisons awarded costs in Fencegate | SITE VISIT

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s